Israel’s Skin Bank Paradox and Organ Harvesting Allegations
Longstanding allegations that Israel harvests organs have resurfaced following the October 7 attacks. Many observers identify these claims as a modern variation of the medieval “blood libel” myth, which falsely accused Jews of using the blood of Christian children for ritual purposes. In today’s Israeli-Palestinian discourse, that trope is reframed around organ theft, with some activists alleging that Israel deliberately kills Palestinians to harvest their organs.
In recent weeks, these accusations have circulated widely on social media and among certain pro-Palestinian advocacy networks. In late November, for example, model and influencer Gigi Hadid reshared a video on Instagram claiming that Israel harvests the organs of deceased Palestinians.
Origins
The controversy gained international attention in 2009 when Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet published an article by journalist Donald Boström suggesting that the Israel Defense Forces might be involved in the unlawful removal of organs from Palestinians. While the article stopped short of directly accusing Israel of killing Palestinians for their organs, it implied serious misconduct and called for an investigation.
The publication sparked diplomatic tensions between Sweden and Israel and fueled widespread speculation online. Boström later acknowledged that he did not possess conclusive evidence but stated that his intention was to prompt further inquiry into the allegations.
Documented Misconduct
In the 1990s, Israel’s Abu Kabir Forensic Institute removed organs and tissues from deceased individuals—including Israeli soldiers, Israeli civilians, Palestinians, and foreign workers—without obtaining proper family consent. The practice was overseen by Dr. Yehuda Hiss, who served as chief pathologist beginning in 1988. During his tenure, multiple controversies emerged regarding the handling of remains, and he was eventually removed from his post in 2012.
A subsequent state inquiry found no evidence that Palestinians were specifically targeted. Instead, investigators concluded that the unauthorized tissue removals affected individuals regardless of nationality, and families of Israeli soldiers were among those who filed complaints.
In 2010, Israeli authorities and the IDF confirmed that the unauthorized practice had ceased. Procedures governing organ and tissue removal were clarified, and consent requirements were reinforced.
From Scandal to Conspiracy Narrative
In the years that followed, critics argue that the documented misconduct at a single forensic institute was expanded into a broader conspiracy theory alleging systematic organ theft from Palestinians. The U.S. State Department has noted instances—most recently in 2022—where public figures repeated such allegations without substantiated evidence.
Recent Incidents
Several recent examples illustrate how the claim has reappeared in public discourse:
December 6: Activist Abier Khatib reshared a TikTok alleging that Israel maintains a “skin bank” supplied with tissue taken from Palestinians—claims rooted in earlier interviews connected to the Abu Kabir controversy.
November 11, 2023: The social media account “Land Palestine” posted accusations that Israel steals skin from Palestinians, again referencing past statements related to the forensic institute scandal.
November 22, 2023: Journalist Yayha Abu Zakariya, appearing on Yemeni-Houthi television, invoked the historic blood libel myth in broader anti-Jewish rhetoric.
November 26, 2023: Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor stated it had “concerns” about possible organ harvesting in Gaza, citing unnamed medical sources who acknowledged the claims were speculative and lacked forensic confirmation.
Overall, while documented ethical violations occurred at a specific Israeli forensic institute in the 1990s, investigations did not substantiate claims of a targeted or systematic policy of killing Palestinians for organ harvesting. Nonetheless, the allegations continue to circulate in political and social media spaces, particularly during periods of heightened conflict.
We examine one of the most controversial and deeply contested dimensions of the ongoing geopolitical conflict: persistent allegations surrounding organ harvesting and the treatment of human remains.
For years, a troubling claim has circulated in medical and political discussions—that Israel maintains one of the world’s largest skin banks despite relatively low domestic organ donation rates compared to many Western nations. This apparent discrepancy has prompted ethical and legal questions about sourcing, consent, and transparency.
This episode explores the historical development of these allegations, tracing them from claims that surfaced during the First Intifada to later public statements by Israeli officials acknowledging that, in past decades, tissues were removed from deceased individuals without explicit family consent. We also examine the legal frameworks involved, including debates over international humanitarian law and Israel’s position on various international agreements.
Key topics discussed include:
The Skin Bank Paradox:
A review of available data on tissue banking in Israel, alongside discussion of cultural and religious factors that have historically influenced organ donation rates.
From Allegation to Admission:
An examination of the timeline of major reporting and public controversy, including the 2009 Swedish Aftonbladet article and subsequent televised remarks by a former head of Israel’s skin bank acknowledging that, in the 1990s, tissues were harvested without formal consent procedures that are now required.
Legal and Ethical Oversight:
A look at international standards governing organ transplantation, debates surrounding the Istanbul Declaration, and concerns raised by critics regarding accountability and transparency.
The Gaza Context:
Analysis of recent human rights reporting concerning the handling and return of bodies during the current conflict, and the broader humanitarian and legal implications.
Calls for Accountability:
The difficulties of conducting independent forensic investigations in conflict zones and discussion of whether international bodies such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) have jurisdiction to investigate potential violations of humanitarian law.
This discussion approaches the issue with attention to documented evidence, legal context, and the ongoing debate among journalists, legal scholars, and human rights advocates.
.jpg)
.jpg)